Jeff Sexton Archive

0

Lee County Georgia censors free speech

By Jeff Sexton

This past week at the Lee County Board of Commissioners meeting, a policy was implemented without it being on the Agenda – at least the online version of it, as it exists at the moment I type this, nearly a week later.

I’m working on getting the video right now – like I did with the Tifton Forum, my plan is to put the SWGAPolitics.com logo in the bottom corner, then cut it for upload to our youtube account – but one of the last items discussed at the meeting was use of the Opal Cannon Auditorium for candidates running for public office. Basically, the policy says (apparently, I haven’t seen a copy of it yet) that candidates running for public office can’t use the building – yet Nathan Deal did back in August! Per County Administrator Alan Ours’ comments during the meeting, the proposed (at the time) policy is “consistent with County policy for other buildings”.

As soon as Mr. Ours finished describing the policy, Commissioner Rick Muggridge tried to discuss it, but Chairman Ed Duffy noted that a motion and second was needed before discussion could be opened. Commissioner Dennis Roland made the motion to approve, with Commissioner Betty Johnson seconding it. Next, Commissioner Muggridge began discussing his concerns, saying that “If the Republican Party of Lee County or the Democratic Party of Lee County wanted to sponsor a debate, I think that would be a great venue for that.” Commissioner Muggridge noted that Deal had already used the facility before noting that even if a candidate came in that the Commissioners absolutely did not agree with, as long as they follow the rules, it should be allowed.

Commissioner Muggridge also noted “If I had a wish, I’d wish that more people would be involved in politics and understand what is going on. I think that by opening this venue up to politicians, which I don’t think is automatically a dirty word, that the public could have more access to those folks.”

After a bit more discussion about the end time of events, Commissioner Muggridge made a motion to strike the policy item in question that died for lack of a second. When the policy – with the item in question still in place – was then voted on moments later, all four voting commissioners voted to approve it, including Muggridge.

According to comments made to Carlton Fletcher Thursday, both Commissioner Muggridge and Chairman Duffy plan to bring this issue back to the Commission at their Jan 12 meeting, with Muggridge quoted as saying, “It’s important enough to the citizens of Lee County to bring up again not just because I support it, but because it opens up a lot of possibilities for the county.” and Duffy saying “I intend to suggest that we make county facilities available to political candidates of all parties, so long as they meet all other requirements. We just have to do it across-the-board.”

As many of you know, I am the chairman of the Libertarian Party of Southwest Georgia. I am also the South Georgia representative on the Libertarian Party of Georgia Executive Committee. Obviously, I have a vested interest in this issue – but my beliefs here are NOT partisan, as I genuinely believe ALL parties should have equal access to the public. Indeed, I started a Facebook group over the summer regarding ballot access where I put in the description “working to allow a level playing field for ALL political parties in Georgia.” Furthermore, my record running this site is proof of my claim, as the only comments we censor here are personal attacks and gratuitous profanity. As long as it remains political and decently clean, I honestly don’t remember Tom or I ever deleting a single comment.

I truly, genuinely believe in the “Top of My Lungs Principle” in regards to free speech. It states that, “You want free speech? Let’s see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who’s standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.” (Yes, it is a line from The American President.)

Apparently, the Lee County Board of Commissioners – outside of Chairman Duffy and Commissioner Muggridge – does not

jeffsexton

Jeff Sexton.

Written by Jeff Sexton. Jeff Sexton co-owns the political blog SWGAPolitics.com and is a candidate for the Leesburg City Council.

Tags: lee county
0

Closing the sexual consent loophole

Last Friday, I wrote about State Rep. (and attorney general candidate) Rob Teilhet saying he wanted to close the loophole in regards to teachers having sex with students being able to use the fact that it was consensual as a defense when charged with sexual assault of a person in custody.

I said then and I maintain that I have ZERO problems with the teacher in question losing their license to teach. I’m even willing to allow – though I’m not completely sold on this – that it should be a crime to begin with. ALL I am saying is that if a person is charged with sexual assault under this statute, the fact that the sex was consensual SHOULD be a valid defense that SHOULD be allowed at trial – as the Supreme Court of Georgia said last summer.

I just wanted to get my position on the matter crystal clear before going into the meat of this post. You see, there is already a bill that attempts to close this “loophole” – State Rep Kevin Levitas’ HB 886 pre-file.

Also please remember that, as always, this commentary is SIMPLY opinion-based commentary from a “civilian” with absolutely no legal training whatsoever. If you need legal advice on the subject matter at hand, PLEASE contact a member of the State Bar of Georgia!

With HB 886, the classifications of people who can be charged with sexual assault of a person in custody is dramatically enhanced – but not as dramatically as one might think upon first glance.

Under current law, a person who is a “probation or parole officer or other custodian or supervisor of another person” commits sexual assault against another person when said other person is “a probationer or parolee under the supervision of said probation or parole officer or who is in the custody of law or who is enrolled in a school or who is detained in or is a patient in a hospital or other institution”. In the other section – where even under current law, consent is NOT a defense of the crime, the victim must be “in the custody of law” or “detained in or is a patient in a hospital or other institution” or the perpetrator must be “an actual or purported practitioner of psychotherapy” who knows or should have known that the victim was a patient.

In other words, under current law ANY probation or parole officer who engages in sexual contact with ANY prisoner can be charged here, as can ANY teacher who has sexual contact with ANY student, and ANY “custodian or supervisor”-type person in a hospital who has sexual contact with ANY patient. That is a key thing to note, because it actually changes under HB 886.

HB 886 adds in several classes of people – employees, agents, or volunteers – of K-12 schools, probation or parole offices, law enforcement agencies, and hospitals into the classifications of people who can be charged under this law- in addition to “actual or purported practitioner[s] of psychotherapy”. It even uses the language from the current law regarding psychotherapists regarding “knows or should have known” that the victim was in a subordinate position.

HOWEVER, whereas current law prohibits a teacher at Albany High School from having sex with a student from Dalton High School (just as an example), HB 886 says that the victim must be under the care of the institution the perpetrator is associated with. In other words, the teacher at Albany High could have sex with the student from Dalton High without criminal penalty. Similarly, a doctor at Palmyra could have sex with a patient from Grady Hospital without criminal penalty.

That said, while HB 886 loosens the law a bit, it also tightens it even moreso – by removing the consent defense for EVERYONE still under this law. In other words, if a teacher at Crisp High has consensual sex with a student at Crisp High, that teacher can NOT use the fact that the sex was consensual as a defense under this law – and thus, the consent “loophole” is closed.

So I guess the question becomes: Is this a fair trade-off and compromise? It would no longer be a crime to have sex with a student who is not a student at your school, but if the person you have sex with IS a student at your school, you can no longer use consent as a valid defense.

While initially I was outraged that consent would be removed as a defense, working through this post and looking at the bill and thinking about it, I actually think that this is a decent compromise.

But hey, I’m just one man. What do y’all think?

Written by Jeff Sexton. Jeff Sexton co-owns the political blog SWGAPolitics.com and is a candidate for the Leesburg City Council.

Tags: Government
0

First aid as a graduation requirement?

Should certification in basic first aid be required of all high school graduates? State Senator Valencia Seay (D-Riverdale) thinks so, and under her SB 298 pre-file, it would happen as soon as 2014.

Along with making it a graduation requirement in 2014, SB 298 would require all health classes in eighth grade and above to begin teaching basic first aid in the 2010-2011 school year and allow volunteers approved by the State Board of Education to teach these classes.

The concept of learning basic first aid is truly a noble one, and I completely agree that it should be learned at an early age. Actually, it already is in the current health curriculum, as one of 45 standards. However, it is not in the proposed new health curriculum that the State Department of Education is set to adopt early next year.

Basic first aid truly is a life-saving skill, and can even help in non-life-threatening situations. It really is a great thing to know.

Like any other subject, unless the student really wants to learn it, it will go in one ear and out the other – but that isn’t my primary objection, just pointing out a tangential fact. No, my objection here really comes down to the fact that even assuming public schools should exist – and I am an active proponent of the separation of school and state – I believe this issue is best left to be taught privately when a student shows an interest, rather than as yet another state-mandated graduation requirement.

Seriously, I would much rather state mandates to the schools – assuming they should exist in the first place – stick to the classic “reading, writing and arithmetic” and let parents and the local community work to teach anything else they deem appropriate, including basic first aid.

I left teaching nearly three years ago – I’m technically certified as a secondary math teacher through the 2010-2011 school year – and even then, we already had more than enough state-mandated graduation requirements.

No, I say back off on the state mandates to local schools, and particularly on these types of classes, let the locals decide. If the locals want the schools to handle this, so be it. If they would rather students pursue it on their own time, that’s cool with me, too.

Tags: education
0

Leesburg has a sign ordinance?

Apparently so, and on the night of my defeat, a new war began.

Not much happened at the Leesburg City Council meeting this week. It started out with a public hearing on a $500K grant the city got to repair some stormwater drainage from the Stonegate apartment area out to Robert B Lee drive. One property owner in the area asked if it covered improvements along the other side of the railroad tracks and was told it did not.

During committee reports, Councilman Bob Wilson asked the chief of police to say a few words about an arrest they made last week. A married man from Alpharetta was busted at McDonald’s after an Internet sting where he thought he was coming down here to meet and have sex with a 13-year-old girl.

Also during committee reports, the city engineer asked the council to consider creating a stormwater utility that upon first glance appears to be a back-door way to raise our taxes. I’ll need to look into this a bit more, but that was my honest impression when I was sitting there listening to him.

Next, Councilwoman Debra Long asked the council to consider moving its regular meeting time to 6 p.m., which was unanimously adopted after being motioned and seconded by other Council members. This will go into effect with the next meeting, Dec 1.

Finally, three people spoke during the public forum at the end of the meeting. I was up first fulfilling the one campaign promise I made – mentioning some problems people in Indian Oaks were having with stormwater flowing off the parking lot at the high school and creating mini-lakes in their yard. Mayor Quinn said that this is a known issue with the council, and that there was nothing the Council could do about it.

Next, the owner of Leesburg Barber Shop stood up to inquire about Leesburg’s own sign ordinance. I wasn’t even aware we had one – and not only do I think they are completely illegal and immoral, I’m honestly not sure why the city of Leesburg even thinks we need one. The Barber Shop is struggling, as are most other businesses in this time, and the owner has had to drop his prices twice recently. He paid $6,800 for this sign three years ago, and it has yet to pay for itself.

At that time, he called someone with either the city or county government – he’s not sure who now, three years later – and was given verbal approval before he bought it. Apparently, in recent weeks this sign has brought him a bit of business, and he hopes this continues. But he also has employment opportunities over at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Brunswick, and if he is forced to remove this sign he may well have to close his shop and leave town. Mayor Quinn and several Council members spoke in favor of the sign ordinance, with Quinn in particular telling this business owner that his sign was “clearly illegal”.

Tom’s issues with the Albany sign ordinance are well known, and now it appears that I have a similar fight of my own. The Barber Shop’s sign is nothing to be concerned about – it is a simple scrolling LED message board (roughly 6-inches tall by call it 6-foot wide?) placed inside his window facing out. You basically have to be staring right at it to even know it is there – even when waiting on the traffic light to turn on to Walnut Ave from the Courthouse at night, as I have done.

Let’s go a bit further with this one though, shall we? Leesburg has three gas stations, two of which are directly across the road from each other. The FlashFoods has an LED sign for their gas prices. This is easy to change from inside the store in any weather and at a moment’s notice. When the Chevron across the street asked to be allowed to put a similar sign up, they were told they could not, per the sign ordinance. This means that an employee of the Chevron must manually go out to the sign and change the plastic numbering, no matter what the weather is like when the price change is ordered.

I can tell you from personal experience working in a gas station several years ago that this sucks! Not to mention the fact that it causes a competitive disadvantage on the Chevron vs. the FlashFoods. Thus, local government favors one business over another, even though the two businesses are literally across the street from each other! This should not be! I urge the council to repeal this ordinance at their next meeting, or at a bare minimum revise it significantly.

Finally, Foxie Harper asked the council why the change was made in the billing process to move from a post card to a full envelope with a return envelope, asking for both the reasoning and how much extra it cost the city. Told that it was the result of a federal privacy law, she dropped her objection.

The next meeting of the City Council will be on Dec 1 at 6 p.m. I’ll be there, and if you live in Leesburg I hope to see you there!

jeffsexton

Jeff Sexton.

Written by Jeff Sexton. Jeff Sexton co-owns the political blog SWGAPolitics.com and is a candidate for the Leesburg City Council.

0

Ox buying his honors

On Saturday, the Cobb County GOP and Cobb County GOP Women held some kind of veteran’s celebration. After the event, Ox put the following up on Twitter:

Honor to sit at head table @ the Veterans Celebration hosted by the Cobb GOP & Cobb GOP Women in Marietta. There were true heroes present.

What he forgot to mention is that he paid $1,000 to sponsor the event, and the sponsorship came with a seat at said head table. It wasn’t an honor he earned in any way – he bought it. You see, the people this celebration was honoring served with honor and integrity, even if they never actually saw a battlefield. Ox uses his goons to bully 15 year old boys. He didn’t even belong in the same BUILDING as those veterans – as the organizers of the event well knew, hence the reason he had to BUY his seat of honor at the event.

I agree with him that, as with any gathering of veterans, there were true heroes present – but he didn’t even honor them by staying for the entire event! Instead, he left early – proving that this was not about the Vets, as it rightfully was, but about further manipulating people and events to fit his own twisted desire for power.

The men and women that event honored have faced things in their lives that I am grateful I will never experience. They put their lives and their fortunes on the line so that I wouldn’t have to. There truly is nothing I can ever do or say to repay the debt I owe each and every person who has ever strapped on the uniform of the United States Armed Forces.

But Ox buying his way into an event that is supposed to honor and thank these men and women, and then betraying them by leaving early? Dang … I really didn’t know a grown man could get any lower than bullying a 15-year-old kid.

Ox just did.

Written by Jeff Sexton. Jeff Sexton co-owns the political blog SWGAPolitics.com and is a candidate for the Leesburg City Council.

0

Ramp, equipment hot Lee topics

Last week’s Lee County Commission meeting was dominated by the proposed boat ramp and discussion of four bids for heavy equipment purchases by the Public Works Department.

Don Windham, a resident of the Canuga subdivision just across the road from the proposed boat ramp, spoke against building it, citing traffic, trash, safety, gangs, and teenagers, among other things. He left before I could speak with him but I asked another person who will be speaking with him to contact me about possibly putting his thoughts on SWGAPolitics.com.

Leesburg Councilman Betty Johnson also spoke against the ramp, citing traffic concerns and maintenance costs. She had spoken with Chief Harris of the Lee County Sheriff’s Office and apparently there have been almost double the number of wrecks in that area this year as compared to the prior two years. Chairman Ed Duffy also spoke against the ramp, again citing traffic and safety concerns. Ultimately, Commissioners Muggridge, Williams, and Roland voted for the ramp while Commissioner Johnson did not. Chairman Duffy asked that it be put on the record that although he did not have the opportunity to vote on the measure (as the Chairman only votes to break ties), he also opposed it.

Ultimately, I also oppose it, and while traffic is certainly a concern – that could be alleviated by putting the ramp on Highway 32 just outside the Leesburg city limits – my objection is the amount of money involved and who is paying for it. County Manager Alan Ours told the board that because the state planned to pay for it using boat motor fuel taxes, it had to have motorized boat capability or the State could not pay for it. I still say Lee County could pay for a canoe ramp if that is what we really wanted, and volunteer effort could be used to build out the rest of the park, not counting the ramp itself and parking areas. This would both save quite a bit of money and instill a sense of civic pride, meaning it is a “win-win” scenario here. This is NOT a park with a truly state or federal purpose, and the state and federal governments should not be asked to pay for it.

The other item that caused much discussion was the heavy equipment bids for Public Works. Commissioner Roland questioned the need for both a track excavator and a wheeled excavator as well as the need for three motorgraders – all after being told that Public Works Director William Clark was unavailable due to his wife having a surgery earlier this week. (Our thoughts and prayers go to the Clark family for a speedy recovery for Mrs. Clark, btw.) Chairman Duffy said that he had complete faith in Mr. Clark, and that if Mr. Clark said he needed this equipment then he needed this equipment.

There happened to be a Caterpillar representative in the audience, and he asked if it was in order if he answer some of Commissioner Roland’s questions. Chairman Duffy invited him to proceed, and he noted that basically a track excavator can get work in muddy, non-paved areas that a wheeled excavator would get stuck in. Meaning that while the wheeled excavator can be driven anywhere in the County, it cannot work in areas where there has recently been heavy rainfall or burst pipes. Without the track excavator, this could cause delays in needed repairs. This sounded reasonable to me, and ultimately three of the four bids were approved unanimously, with Commissioner Roland being the only dissenting vote on the track excavator.

The Commissioners also approved a bid for repairs on New York Rd unanimously, and Commissioner Muggridge updated the Commission on the progress of the Complete Count Committee.

Finally, in the public forum, I spoke about my plans to organize a MLK Day of Service to clean and repair the park at Academy Avenue and 4th Street in Leesburg. I also told the Commission that it needed a name, and was informed by Commissioner Muggridge that it did, in fact, have a name – Leesburg Central Park. That was actually my fault for having bad information, though the information I had came from one usually highly reliable source in particular – who shall remain nameless at this point.

Tags: lee county
0

Leesburg needs openness, professionalism

On Nov. 3, the citizens of the City of Leesburg will have a choice between two competing visions. My vision takes the best of the old ways and implements them using fresh, new methods to achieve the best combination of both old and new.

One great thing about the old days was that people could sit around and talk to each other about ideas and events. Due to a variety of factors, you really don’t see that too much these days – but we can. I’ve been a pioneer of that over the past 10 months or so with my work in creating and operating SWGAPolitics.com, a forum for anyone in SWGA to talk politics in a manner that we try to keep generally civil. As the newest Leesburg city councilman, I will continue to push for this genuine open forum to discuss any issue that arises. I’ve also already begun using my personal site, JefferySexton.com, as a way to discuss campaign-specific issues, and I will continue to use it as my “official” site once in office.

A great thing about the new ways is our commitment to professionalism and openness in government. We now expect council members to be at meetings and we expect websites and other resources so that we can keep tabs on our government. I can honestly say that the only meeting I have ever missed once I committed to doing something was last week’s County Commission meeting that fell on my anniversary – and that is from any position I have ever held, going all the way back to my college days. That is a record I intend to keep intact as the newest Leesburg City Councilman. I also intend to create a new website that has at a minimum the agendas and minutes of every City Council meeting, as well as contact information for every City of Leesburg Department head and other relevant information about City government.

The era of good-ole-boy politics is dead, and it should stay dead. I have been working for openness, transparency, professionalism, and civility since beginning my political involvement one year ago, and I will continue that work as the newest Leesburg city councilman.

jeffsexton

Jeff Sexton.

Written by Jeff Sexton. Jeff Sexton co-owns the political blog SWGAPolitics.com and is a candidate for the Leesburg City Council.

0

Should churches pay taxes?

Doug Rea, the pastor at Connections Albany, is one of the most genuine men I’ve ever met, in any walk of life – much less as a Christian and pastor. Considering the company I’ve kept over the years, that is truly one of the highest compliments I can give a person, and I mean every word of it.

Much like other pastors I’ve looked up to – such as Jeff Hill at Calvary Baptist in Ball Ground, Chris Altman and John Sullivan somewhere in northwest Georgia, and even Albany’s Tony Haefs of Gillionville Baptist – Doug has made me think about things in a way I really never had before, and I will be forever grateful for that.

Doug leads a church that is so organic and genuine that they don’t even like to use the word “church” to describe themselves due to the word’s abuse over the last couple of millenia. So much like Ted Dekker’s “Circle”, they call themselves simply a “Gathering”. They don’t have a “sanctuary” or even church offices – their entire building is one room, in the same building as Charlie B’s – which led to some interesting times with the Albany City Commission, which Tom Knighton wrote about back in April. (Hard to believe, but that post was actually among Tom’s first!)

Doug and Connections challenge traditional Christianity, and turn much of it on its head. I plan to interview him soon – more than likely AFTER Election Day – about these, but he condensed the basics down into a few Twitter comments to me a couple of weeks ago, and given our recent discussions in other thread, I thought I would bring them out for discussion here:

These Tweets specifically regard the tax exempt status of churches:

1. govt and church should not be in business together

2. obviously they are not using the tax code 2 benefit society — they’d never build those cathedrals if they had to pay taxes on em

3. it’d halt the tax benefits for “religious” organizations that are not US friendly

I’ve talked to him a bit about this already, and one key thing he said sticks with me: Churches, like many “charities”, spend the vast majority of the money they bring in on salaries, buildings, and basically “looking good”. Meanwhile we have people starving in the streets because the church MIGHT spend 10 percent of its total revenues on actually reaching out to people.

So I put the questions out to y’all:

1. Should churches pay taxes?

2. What would happen if a church was treated just like any other business?

jeffsexton

Jeff Sexton.

Written by Jeff Sexton. Jeff Sexton co-owns the political blog SWGAPolitics.com and is a candidate for the Leesburg City Council.

Tags: taxes
0

Recreation important to Leesburg

As I walk around Leesburg talking to people, I keep hearing about recreation and the need for more safe recreation opportunities in town. Not just organized sports, such as baseball, softball, and soccer, but solo exercise such as a walking loop or a safe place for kids to play on a playground without fear of a baseball flying over a nearby fence.

The problem for these people is two-fold: 1) The City of Leesburg doesn’t have a Parks and Recreation Department, it is entirely run by the County. 2) Their City Commissioners don’t always show up for their own meetings, much less the County Commission meetings where recreation opportunities could be discussed.

Because the City of Leesburg doesn’t have a Parks and Recreation Department, one might think that City Councilpersons might take an interest in showing up to Lee County Board of Commissioners meetings, where they could at least keep track of what the county was doing in regards to such a major issue with their constituents. I’ve been doing that for two months, long before I decided to run for City Council myself. The problem is, I haven’t seen any city councilperson there with the exception of Mayor Jim Quinn. Furthermore, of the two City Council meetings I’ve gone to, only three councilpersons have been at both of them – Sydney Johnson, Bob Wilson, and Mayor Quinn.

The citizens of Leesburg deserve a councilman dedicated enough to seek out news and developments on the topics that concern them, as well as the topics that are boring to them but are equally important. They deserve a councilman professional enough to actually show up at the meetings where these issues are discussed. They deserve a councilman open enough to share his own analysis of the topic and the information he based his analysis on.

I created SWGAPolitics.com with those exact ideals nine months ago, and I will continue to uphold those ideals as the newest Leesburg city councilman.

jeffsexton

Jeff Sexton.

Written by Jeff Sexton. Jeff Sexton co-owns the political blog SWGAPolitics.com and is a candidate for the Leesburg City Council.

Tags: lee county
0

A public challenge to Roy Barnes

Earlier this week, Roy Barnes stated, “I’m fed up with both the Democrats and the Republicans. I’d be a Bull Moose or a Whig if they still had a party.”

Now, David Poythress took exception to this, saying in an e-mail, “So, in addition to Roy Barnes dissing the Democratic Party, he says he wishes he could be a member of the political party whose members flocked into the Republican Party. Roy is out of touch and for the sake of his legacy, he should leave the Primary campaign to those of us who are proud to be Democrats!”

I met Gen. Poythress Friday night at the Albany Mall after he spoke to a group at Albany State’s homecoming festivities, and he really is a nice guy – completely partisan, but also very genuine and upfront about things.

But the conflict between Barnes and Poythress sets up my challenge, as I’m actually going to echo Poythress to a degree:

Mr. Barnes,

You may not be aware, but the Whig Party DOES, in fact, exist. In fact, you can view their site at ModernWhig.org , and you can view their issues on that site.

Now honestly, you were just before my time. I was 15 years old when you were elected governor last time, and I wasn’t politically active at all. So I know next to nothing about you other than what I have heard people say over the years.

But if you were truly serious about being fed up with both the Democrats and Republicans, and you truly mean what you told Dick Pettys at Insider Advantage when you said, “Have we come to this, that we ignore the real issues and concentrate on an off-the-cuff remark explaining that we need not be Republicans or Democrats but Georgians?”, I highly encourage you to seek out a so-called “third” party which you DO agree with, and run for governor with that party – whether it be the Whigs, the Libertarians, the Greens, the Constitutionals, or any other.

You see, I know all too well the ballot restrictions parties other than the Democrats and Republicans face, and I trust that those restrictions won’t be so tough on a former Governor such as yourself. The way I see it, if you become governor as a third party, we may have more success in eliminating Georgia’s draconian ballot access restrictions, thus allowing a much more free and open debate about who our leaders are and who we want them to be. With this truly free and open debate, we can then concentrate on being Georgians rather than Party members.

So what do you say, Mr. Barnes? Do you truly want us to be Georgians first, or was this simply more campaign rhetoric?

We’ve had more than enough of the latter; it truly is time for the former.

jeffsexton

Jeff Sexton.

Written by Jeff Sexton. Jeff Sexton co-owns the political blog SWGAPolitics.com and is a candidate for the Leesburg City Council.

Tags: politics
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline